THE Scottish Government has flatly denied claims that Scottish Water would be privatised if Scotland became independent.
Reports said Alex Salmond would make a U-turn on his opposition to the move and change it into a public benefit corporation like Network Rail.
Selling it off could raise up to £2.7 billion, and it was claimed that Mr Salmond had hinted at the move earlier this year when he said Scottish Water was a successful company which could "cheaply and easily" borrow from financial markets but due to its status was restricted to borrowing from the Scottish Government capital allocation.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The story is wrong. Of course we want Scottish Water to have the ability to borrow so that we can boost infrastructure investment, and we are equally clear that it would remain a company in public ownership on that basis – both under devolution and with independence.
"Network Rail is able to borrow – Scottish Water should have the same status, as the First Minister said, and would certainly have the ability to borrow in an independent Scotland, but it does not need to have the same structure as Network Rail to borrow."
The spokesman said Scottish Water has been a success story.
He added: "Following independence, the Scottish Government would allow Scottish Water to issue bonds to the capital markets and such bonds would be extremely attractive to a range of investors."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article