GEORGE Osborne has faced calls to cut fuel tax following reports he will scrap a planned duty rise in next week's Budget.
The Chancellor is thought to be considering scrapping a 3p a litre rise in fuel duty due this autumn.
But motoring groups called on the Government to cut the tax on petrol.
FairFuelUK spokesman Quentin Willson said: "Scrapping the planned autumn rise may be a welcome signal that the Government is listening but, if these reports are correct, families and businesses will be devastated that fuel duty isn't going to be cut next week.
"The country wants a reduction in their petrol and diesel bills, and actually lowering duty is the only way to offer that."
However, Jason Torrance, of sustainable transport body Sustrans, said scrapping the rise would be an expensive mistake which would cost £1.5 billion. He added: "If the Prime Minister and the Chancellor really want to tackle the cost of living for Britons, they need to give people a choice about how they travel by making affordable forms of transport."
The Government said fuel would cost 10p a litre more if it was not for previous scrapped increases.
But motoring groups warned fuel costs could hit record levels again. AA president Edmund King said: "High fuel costs hit not only drivers but the entire economy."
l Downing Street is considering plans to privatise national assets instead of a further round of spending cuts, with a review being carried out by a civil servant, according to reports.
Coalition ministers are under pressure to come up with extra cuts but some departments have said they can cut no more.
But any suggestion that assets were to be privatised on a large scale would led to accusations that ministers were trying to "pawn the family silver".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article