THE public may be put at risk by plans to raise the retirement age for firefighters by five years, an academic has warned.
Professor Andrew Watterson of Stirling University, who specialises in health and safety issues, said raising the pensionable age from 55 to 60 would present "serious potential threats to those they may need to rescue and their own health and welfare.
On Thursday, more than 300 Fire Brigades Union protesters took part in a demonstration at Holyrood, warning that many officers will face tough fitness tests raising the possibility of them being forced out of their jobs.
Prof Watterson added: "There are major questions of fairness raised by shifting people who joined up on one scheme to a worse scheme and to increasing their chances of 'capability dismissal'."
He suggested the changes looked highly inequitable on gender grounds too.
He said: "The Scottish Government has rightly flagged its commitment to social justice and to protecting emergency workers.
"One would hope that it will now clearly signal it does not support the Westminster attack on older firefighters and their pensions and take a different and fairer route."
He said: "A retirement age of 60 might be viewed as generous but it simply fails to consider properly what exactly the demands of a particular job are. Firefighters face increasing physical demands as they age."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article