THE SNP has moved away from its hardline position on independence but as the possibility of achieving it grows it must clarify what it would mean for Scotland, according to research.
It says 71% of the party’s members viewed independence as their primary goal but 65% thought it would need to take second place to other issues.
Strathclyde University Professor James Mitchell, who led the research, said the results showed there was a “considerable degree of pragmatism” in the party about independence.
When questioned about sharing services across the UK, almost all members were comfortable with sharing some of them such as the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency.
“This confirmed the SNP has moved away from the hardline position of the past,” said Mr Mitchell.
The findings of his survey were based on 7112 completed questionnaires.
It was conducted between November 2007, the year the party first won power at Holyrood, and June 2008.The researchers found 87% wanted Scottish independence, with 65% preferring independence as part of the European Union.
Mr Mitchell said: “The reality of holding power has encouraged a more pragmatic stance inside the SNP. As its goal of independence appears more likely, it has to clarify what it means by independence.”
Nuclear weapons was the one subject on which senior members were unanimously opposed.
SNP business convener Derek Mackay said: “SNP members share a positive view of Scotland’s future, supporting a stronger Scotland under devolution, the full powers and responsibilities of independence and a strong social union with the rest of the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article