THE UK needs a like-for-like replacement for Trident, David Cameron has claimed, after warning North Korea could target Britain with its nuclear missiles.
The Prime Minister underlined his support for a direct replacement for Britain's nuclear deterrent during a visit to Scotland which he also used to highlight the strength of Scottish defence industries as part of the UK.
Speaking to workers at defence manufacturer Thales, in Glasgow, he said growing signs of aggression from North Korea were a "good example" of the need to maintain a state-of-the-art nuclear deterrent.
He said: "North Korea does now have missile technology that is able to reach, as they put it, the whole of the United States.If they are able to reach the whole of the US they can reach Europe too, they can reach us too. Now that is a real concern."
He said the actions of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's regime were "worrying and threatening" and the country had "extremely dangerous" weapons.
He spoke out after North Korea's military warned it has been authorised to attack the US using "smaller, lighter and diversified" nuclear weapons in the latest of a series of aggressive moves from Pyongyang.
The SNP's Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon dismissed the Prime Minister's claims. She said: "Trident isn't the answer to the threats we face as a country.
"It diverts resources from conventional defence and the vast amounts of money spent on Trident and its replacement would be far better spent on other priorities."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article