FIRSTGROUP'S £5.5 billion 13-year deal to run the West Coast Main Line is on hold because of a legal challenge by Virgin Rail.
The UK Government announced the move last night, confirming "the competition remains live". However, Transport Minister Theresa Villiers insisted the Coalition intended to "defend robustly" its decision to hand over Britain's most lucrative franchise to First West Coast, a subsidiary of the Aberdeen-based FirstGroup.
The agreement was to have been signed last week but Virgin chief Sir Richard Branson made it known at the 11th hour that his company, which has run the Scotland to London line since 1997, was seeking a judicial review to challenge the Government's decision. It queried First West Coast's promises of more trains, lower fares and refurbished stations. The Scottish-based company insisted it had won the franchise "fair and square".
Labour complained the contentious deal had been sealed during the parliamentary recess and wanted a delay so MPs could scrutinise the details.
An e-petition on the Downing Street website, calling for the Government to reconsider the First West Coast deal, has now topped 167,000.
But, in a written ministerial statement, Ms Villiers said: "The commitments in First West Coast's bid represent significant improvements for passengers and will provide a good return for the taxpayer.
"As a result of a legal challenge, which the Government intends to defend robustly, we have not yet signed the contract with First West Coast and the competition remains live."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article