An academic adviser to the pro-union Better Together campaign has hit back at the First Minister in the row about an independent Scotland's membership of the European Union.
Professor Jim Gallagher responded days after Alex Salmond quoted him in support of the case for seamless EU transition within 18 months.
But in a letter to Mr Salmond, he writes: "I have consistently said that's too short for all that needs done. Indeed, setting a fixed date weakens our negotiating hand. Imagine trying to buy a house when the seller knows you have no choice about the entry date. What happens to the price?"
Mr Salmond used his words against a challenge from Tory leader Ruth Davidson during First Minister's Questions at Holyrood.
She had said the SNP's preferred route into the EU through a treaty amendment is not legally correct.
Mr Salmond replied, quoting a blog by the academic: "It seems pretty likely Scotland would be an EU member state probably, after an accelerated set of accession negotiations.''
Prof Gallagher's letter continues: "I'm sure you didn't mean to mislead, but you should have spotted that I was talking and have only ever written about accession, not treaty amendment.
"To my knowledge, I've never written anything about treaty amendment, because it's clearly not suitable."
A spokesman for the First Minister said: "Professor Gallagher has been caught red handed telling the truth and because it doesn't suit the Project Fear script, he's trying to worm his way out of it.
"The fact is that his admission - that any requirements to join the euro or Schengen "can surely be avoided" and that Scotland's membership of the EU would be agreed in an "accelerated timetable" - have utterly undermined key scare arguments of the No campaign."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article