A GROUP of Scottish academics opposed to independence has attacked claims university research will be strengthened by a Yes vote.
Instead, the group argues an independent Scotland would put the future of Scottish universities and their major contributions to Scotland "at serious risk".
The warning comes after the Scottish Government published a report on research funding earlier this week. There is currently concern Scotland would miss out on significant research funding if the UK-wide research councils ceased to exist after independence.
Ministers have argued the existing arrangements could be preserved following negotiations with the government paper stating: "We will maintain effective existing collaborations that work well while extending our global reach with new networks and partnerships."
However, pro-Union academics, including Hugh Pennington, emeritus professor of bacteriology at Aberdeen University, said questions about the mechanisms for funding research remained unanswered.
In a letter to The Herald the academic group stated: "Plans are still based on the naive assumption that little will change with independence.
"A single research system between the two countries has already been rejected by the UK government. There are no precedents for such a system.
"Overall, the irony of the Scottish Government paper is that it lauds the virtues of the present UK system. If it is so good, isn't continuing membership of the Union a better option?"
Meanwhile, it has emerged Scottish universities generate one-quarter of the UK's research companies. New figures estimate university spin-out firms in Scotland have a total turnover of more than £300 million and the sector accounts for 26% of new UK companies generated by research, compared to Scotland's UK population share of 8.4%.
Education Secretary Michael Russell said: "Scotland punches above its weight when it comes to higher education."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article