Undecided voters are more likely to back independence, but not in high enough numbers to win a Yes vote in the referendum, according to new research.
The British Election Study (BES) analysed data on voting intentions collected in March and June, which showed that those who said they did not know how they would vote in March were more likely to back Yes three months later.
March's survey showed 52% support for No compared with 37% for Yes, with the rest undecided.
There was little change in these headlines figures in June, with 51% backing for No, 39% backing for Yes and 10% saying they did not know.
Of those who said "don't know" in March, 25% said they would vote Yes in June, 18% said they would vote No while the remainder still did not know.
"If all the remaining 'don't knows' moved from undecided to Yes in exactly the same proportion as those between March and June, the final result would likely be Yes 44% and No 56%," researchers said.
They also found that the economy is one of the most important factors which would persuade voters to change their vote to Yes.
Professor Ed Fieldhouse, from the University of Manchester, co-director of the study, said: "The BES is unique in that it is able to track the referendum vote intention of the same voters over time.
"The data tells us that the vast majority of those intending to vote Yes or No did not change their mind in the three months between March and June.
"However, the don't knows are still significant. We find they are more likely to vote Yes when the time comes.
"But our data also shows not enough of them will support the Yes camp to win the eventual race: more people are yet to be persuaded."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article