UK companies should consider splitting their occupational pension schemes to avoid potentially crippling payments if Scotland becomes independent, a leading actuarial consultant has warned.
Donald Campbell, of pension consultants Xafinity, said firms should prepare to run separate Scottish and UK schemes for staff.
The call follows a report from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) which highlighted an EU directive prohibiting firms from operating underfunded "cross-border" pension schemes.
ICAS warned companies would have to find billions of pounds to plug black holes in their pension funds immediately if Scotland split from the UK.
The professional body urged the Scottish and UK Governments to address the issue ahead of next year's independence referendum.
Mr Campbell said firms were most likely to split UK-wide defined benefit schemes, though the move would add to the cost of providing pensions. "Prior to the directive coming into force it was quite common for UK and Ireland employers to have cross-border schemes," he said.
"But Ireland and the UK were given a few years' grace to implement the directive where there were cross-border issues."
Most pension schemes do not have the funds to cover payments to present and future members.
Many are operating 10 or 15-year recovery plans to bring their assets more closely into line with their liabilities, a move allowed within a single EU country. However, the directive would force firms to plug the gaps immediately unless a deal with Brussels could be struck.
The Scottish Government dismissed ICAS's concerns, saying cross-border pension arrangements were "commonplace" and citing the measures introduced to deal with UK and Ireland schemes when the EU rules were introduced.
SNP ministers are expected to publish a report on pensions before the Government issues its full blueprint for independence in November.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article