UNIONIST politicians must keep their promises of more devolution if Scotland votes No to independence, historian Sir Tom Devine said.
Some people have said core nationalists are heading for "a collective nervous breakdown" if Scotland votes No, Sir Tom told an audience in Edinburgh.
He said it may not be that bad but that "it will certainly be much worse than 1979" when Scotland was promised more powers if it voted No to devolution and Westminster failed to deliver.
Sir Tom became the first Scottish historian to receive a knighthood this week in the Queen's Birthday Honours, and is retiring from his role as director of the Scottish Centre for Diaspora Studies at the University of Edinburgh this summer.
He held a public conversation with former prime minister Gordon Brown, a prominent unionist campaigner, to mark his retirement.
Sir Tom said he intends to cast a vote in the referendum, but refused to reveal his constitutional preference.
He said a Yes vote would be followed by "a period of very exciting activity".
But, he said, No would be "much more difficult" to manage because of the collective disappointment of core nationalists.
"Even more important than a Yes vote will be the discussions that take place afterwards," Sir Tom said.
"A No vote is much more difficult because, there is no doubt about it, people who support Yes, that core of 30 per cent who through thick and thin has gone for it, if there is a No vote then they are going to be terribly, terribly disappointed.
"Some people have said 'a collective nervous breakdown'.
"It might not be that but it will certainly be much worse than 1979."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article