MORE devolved powers remains the clear winner over independence or the status quo when offered as an alternative, according to an opinion poll commissioned by the Reform Scotland think-tank.
The Ipsos MORI poll was based on the same sample used by newspapers earlier this week which put overall support for a Yes vote in favour of independence at 32%, compared to 55% who would vote No.
Reform Scotland asked an extra set of questions, which showed 29% for the status quo, 27% for independence, but 41% in favour of remaining "part of the UK with the increased powers outlined in the Devo Plus proposal".
It also asked who should be responsible for raising most of the money the Scottish Parliament spends, with 61% saying the Scottish Government and 29% the UK Government. Asked whether the pro-Union parties should campaign for more powers for Holyrood as the alternative to independence, 66% agreed, while only 17% disagreed.
Ben Thomson, chairman of the think-tank behind the Devolution Plus proposal, said: "This poll is further proof of what we have suspected for some time – the current debate on Scotland's constitutional future is not adequately serving the people of Scotland because it is largely ignoring their preferred way forward.
"In a poll on the preferred route forward, neither the status quo nor independence can muster even 30% support, while Devo Plus polls over 40%.
"Most Scots have identified the key problem with the current devolution settlement – that the Scottish Parliament is not properly accountable for raising the money it spends. With twice the number of people believing that the Scottish Government should raise most of this money rather than the Westminster Government, we would urge all political parties to consider whether they are adequately representing popular demand."
He added: "It's time for the parties to lay their cards on the table. It's time people know exactly what they're voting for, and if nobody is offering Devo Plus – the most popular option – the question must be: why not?"
Jeremy Purvis, leader of the Devo Plus Group, said: "This is the first substantive test of opinion in Scotland on the Devo Plus proposals and shows very clearly the desire of the Scottish people to improve on the status quo, but rejecting independence. The very clear support for Devo Plus as the best way forward for Scotland should be listened to.
"The evidence is also clear that the vast majority of people would like the parties that do not support independence to work together to progress the case for Devo Plus. Devo Plus is not a tactic to defeat independence, rather it is a carefully considered way forward for a stronger Scotland within the UK."
Labour MSP Patricia Ferguson said: "This poll really makes the case for devolution. But Scotland now urgently needs to make a decision on whether or not we are part of the UK. Devolution – of whatever flavour – is not a stepping-stone on the way to independence, so before we decide how best Scotland's place in the UK develops, we need to decide whether or not we are part of the UK."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The vital issue is that the terms and timing of the referendum, including whether there is a 'more powers' option, are matters to be decided in Scotland, not imposed by Westminster."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article