MORE oil firms think Scottish independence will be positive for the industry than those that think it will be negative, according to a survey.
Most say independence would make little difference (38 per cent) while a large number say it is too difficult to predict (32 per cent), a survey of 700 oil and gas firms by Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce found.
But independence was the preferred option of those who expressed an opinion either way, with 18 per cent saying it would be positive against 12 per cent who said it would be negative.
Firms with fewer than 200 employees were most likely to say a vote in favour would be a positive development for the sector.
This uncertainty while Scotland decides is causing "more angst" than the outcome of the vote, according to law firm Bond Dickinson, which sponsored the survey.
A rising number of firms say the pre-referendum uncertainty is affecting their investment decisions, up from 38 per cent to 45 per cent in the last year.
This outcome is expected, according to Bond Dickinson partner Uisdean Vass.
Energy minister Fergus Ewing said: "It is very welcome that 56 per cent of oil and gas companies surveyed either believe that independence will be positive for the sector or will make little difference."
Better Together director Richard Baker, a Labour MSP, said: "It is clear that uncertainty over currency if we leave the UK is forcing oil firms to delay investment in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article