ALEX Salmond is holding a "gun to the head" of local government in Scotland by refusing to give it more power unless there is a Yes vote in September's referendum, Lord Wallace, the Advocate General, has claimed.
The minister's remarks were made at the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities conference in St Andrews, which also heard from Nicola Sturgeon, who said: "I don't believe in independence just to transfer powers from Westminster to Holyrood; those powers should be transferred further down to local level."
But the Deputy First Minister was jeered when she suggested the SNP's council tax freeze had not removed power from local government, insisting councils still had a choice if they were willing to accept a cut in funding from Edinburgh.
Sarah Boyack, for Scottish Labour, who has been part of the commission finalising Labour's plans for more power-sharing, dropped a large hint that so-called city deals and further devolution to the Scottish islands would feature in Labour's offering when it is unveiled at the party's conference next week.
Saying how she could give her audience a sense of direction on Labour's proposals, she pointed to some "really exciting discussions" on city deals, looking at how local government could be empowered to build up a series of services. "It's not just about giving local government responsibility or power but also giving local government an income stream to go with them," explained the MSP.
Referring to the SNP Government's White Paper, which noted how independence would give Scotland the power to embed the role of local authorities in a written constitution, Lord Wallace stressed: "Of course, there is nothing to stop the Scottish Government doing this now. It is that gun-to-head negotiating tactic again; deliberately implying that only independence allows anything to happen."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article