DAVID Cameron has sparked a major row after suggesting Scottish lives would be put at greater risk of terrorist attack by independence.
Speaking at a meeting in York, the Prime Minister said: "Look at the problems of terrorism - very much in my mind with all the news of the appalling events in Nairobi, the apparent abduction of the Libyan Prime Minister this morning.
"When you think about how to keep us safe as a country, it's better that we have police forces that work together, intelligence and security services that cover the whole of our United Kingdom. So I hope we send a very clear message to the Scots that we want you to stay."
Last night, Alex Salmond responded angrily, with his spokesman saying: "This is distasteful and absolutely disgraceful for the Prime Minister to use an incident in which six Britons and 72 people died to campaign against Scottish independence. This is a new low for Project Fear."
This week, the UK Government's analysis paper on defence and independence raised doubts that a breakaway Scotland would be accepted into the so-called Five Eyes intelligence-sharing community, comprising the UK, US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and that it would cease to benefit from the bilateral UK-US relationship.
The paper concluded: "In effect, this would almost certainly mean Scotland losing access to billions of pounds of world-class military capability and access to vital intelligence material, which is essential for maintaining national defence and security."
In its recent report on Scottishindependence, the Commons Defence Committee also suggested an independent Scotland would find itself at a greater security risk than at present.
It said: "A high degree of co-operation with the UK would be crucial for Scotland, especially in the early years of independence. However, such co- operation would rely on goodwill and Scotland could find itself more vulnerable to threats than it is at present."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article