THE pro-UK parties yesterday announced they had recruited a panel of constitutional experts to come up with a single question for the independence referendum ballot paper.
The move prompted Alex Salmond, who last week appointed his own referendum adviser, to brand the tactic a "desperate and silly gimmick".
Labour, Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats said the creation of the panel would ensure a clear and neutral form of words for a straight yes/no ballot due in 2014.
It will be chaired by Lord Sutherland of Houndwood and feature Dr Matt Qvortrup, an expert on constitutional issues, and Ron Gould, who investigated the fallout from the troubled 2007 Holyrood election.
Their proposed question will be submitted to the Electoral Commission for testing; the Scottish Government has already made clear its preferred question would be tested by the elections watchdog.
Johann Lamont, the Scottish Labour leader, said: "The question to be put to the Scottish people in the referendum is too important to be left in the hands of politicians."
She made clear the offer was still on the table "for the First Minister to join with us and take this forward on a cross-party basis".
However, Mr Salmond's spokesman was scathing about the new panel, saying: "It is presumptuous in the extreme of the anti-independence parties to prejudge the referendum process by trying to narrow the options available to people in the referendum before the conclusion of the Scottish Government's consultation process.
"The referendum must be made in Scotland without any Westminster strings attached."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article