A second referendum on Scottish independence might be necessary because clarity on some of the key issues would be impossible to achieve before the vote in September 2014, according to one of Alex Salmond's former key economic advisers.
Professor John Kay, an economist, who sat on the Scottish Government's economic advisory panel, was responding to the publication of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee report, which called for London and Edinburgh to set out their positions on key issues for the electorate. He made clear there would have to be a "long process of negotiation between Scotland and the rest of the UK to establish what independence actually meant".
Lord MacGregor, the committee chairman, said: "It's crucial the major implications are debated and understood by the voters well before the actual vote takes place.
"It's just not good enough to say so many of these issues can be solved after the vote by negotiations because so many of them are crucial to understanding on how to vote, such as currency, defence, the divisions of assets, what the division of debts is going to be and liabilities, negotiations with the EU because it's clear Scotland would have to negotiate its position into the EU. All of these issues need to be understood beforehand and that's why we are calling on both governments to indicate their red lines."
However, Mr Kay said: "You could have a vote on the principle of independence but then you have to have several years of negotiation and at the end of that time you might well have to ask the people of Scotland again – is this the package you wanted when you voted for independence?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article