Students from Glasgow Caledonian University have voted for Scotland to remain in the UK in a mock referendum.
The survey of more than 1,500 students found 63% in favour of Scotland remaining in the UK against 37% who supported independence.
The result follows similar votes at the University of Glasgow and Aberdeenshire schools' mock referendums, and mirrors recent opinion polls which indicate support for independence remains below two-fifths.
Sogand Azimi, a student at Glasgow Caledonian University, said: "This is another encouraging result for the campaign to keep Scotland in the UK.
"It's clear that more and more young people are rejecting Alex Salmond's divisive campaign for separation.
"As part of the UK our young people benefit from the opportunities that come from being part of something bigger.
"The only thing putting this at risk is separation. The young people of Scotland know that we are stronger and better together."
The Yes campaign is polling above 40% when "don't knows" are excluded from the polls, a Yes Scotland spokesman said.
On Friday, a poll at an Engender Scotland women's event at Glasgow City Chambers found a majority in favour of Yes and a debate at Strathclyde University between Humza Yousaf and Ana's Sarwar on the Muslim community also concluded with majority support for independence.
Recently, Ayr College and Prestwick Academy both saw swings of undecided and No voters shift to Yes after debates between representatives of both campaigns.
Strathclyde University, Abertay University, Edinburgh University, Napier University, Shetland College, Perth & Kinross Youth Council and Newsnight Scotland have also held debates where support for independence increased after the contest.
A Robert Gordon University poll of 167 students last month found a larger swing from "don't know" to No than to Yes following a debate, with No voters ultimately outweighing Yes voters by about two to one.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article