Labour has highlighted warnings by television producers that independence could lead to 'paralysis' in the industry.
The comments came as the BBC Radio 4 presenter Eddie Mair outed himself - as a "don't know".
In the Radio Times, he joked about the "complete lack of representation of the Don't Know campaign" in the debate.
In interviews with Broadcast magazine a number of leading independent TV producers warned the SNP's plans for broadcasting after independence could lead to paralysis and job losses.
Steve Morrison, chairman of All3Media company, said: "There is a cloud of uncertainty over the Scottish production industry ...We could have an interregnum of up to two years and businesses need positive momentum. Once you start going backwards and stop getting commissions,you have to look if you can keep your staff and creativity going."
He added: "The current system where Scottish producers think both nationally and locally is a great set-up, and I'm not sure a change would be better."
Jane Muirhead, the managing director of one of Scotland's biggest independent production companies Raise the Roof Productions, said business is "buoyant and there's a genuine fear any changes to the landscape could be detrimental in the short term".
And David Strachan, managing director of Tern Television, warned of months of commissioning "paralysis" following a Yes vote.
Labour's shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran MP said: "These statements from leading television and media executives show how damaging the SNP's plans to break up the BBC are.".
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The broadcasting sector would benefit from independence. A Scottish Broadcasting Service, working in a joint venture with the BBC, would increase production in Scotland and fiscal powers would increase the scope of the Scottish Government to support the sector."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article