NIGEL Farage's UKIP has been plunged into a fresh racism row after one of its candidates suggested Mo Farah, the double Olympic champion, was not British because he was African.
The development came after another council candidate for the anti-EU party resigned from it after making offensive comments about comedian Lenny Henry. William Henwood, who suggested Mr Henry should emigrate to a "black country", was due to stand for UKIP in next month's council election in Enfield, north London.
But a party spokesman said Mr Henwood had resigned his membership of UKIP after it was "mutually agreed this would be the best course", acknowledging that his comments had "caused enormous offence".
The party has already begun action to expel two members after an internal investigation found evidence of links to far right groups.Last night, it emerged that David Wycherley, standing for UKIP in Walsall, had asked his Facebook friends to explain "how Mo Farah, an African from Somalia, who trains in America, won a gold medal for Great Britain?" Mr Farah, who was born in Mogadishu but moved to London aged eight, became a double Olympic champion for Britain at the 2012 Olympics and was later awarded a CBE by the Queen for services to athletics.
A UKIP spokesman, asked about Mr Wycherley's remarks, declined to comment, saying he had not seen them.
Earlier, Mr Farage insisted attempts to portray UKIP as racist would prove a "disastrous mistake" for the established political parties.
He likened attempts to portray his party as racist with the dismissal by former Prime Minister Gordon Brown of a voter, who complained about the impact of immigration during the 2010 General Election campaign, as a "bigot".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article