THE significant constitutional shift of giving 1.5 million 16 and 17-year-olds across the UK the vote edged closer yesterday after Downing Street made clear that the option of allowing 126,000 Scottish teenagers to participate in the 2014 independence referendum was "on the table".
Up until now, David Cameron has set his face against Alex Salmond's call to allow Scottish teenagers to take part in the poll on the future of Scotland, making clear that it would adhere to the current franchise – only those over 18 would be allowed to vote.
In February, Michael Moore, the Scottish Secretary, insisted 16 and 17-year-olds would not be given the vote, saying: "So far, we have not yet heard a convincing argument that says you should change the basis of the franchise on this one-off referendum.
"The fairest basis is to use the franchise that elected the very parliament that gave the First Minister his mandate to have a referendum."
This position was adopted despite the fact that the Liberal Democrats as a party support extending the franchise, as does Labour.
As recently as April, the UK Government, following its consultation on the independence referendum, made clear 16 and 17-year-olds would not be allowed to vote in the independence poll; the consultation showed 44% backed giving youngsters the vote while 47% were opposed.
However, yesterday No 10 made clear the Prime Minister had softened the Coalition's line. His spokesman said: "These are all issues for discussion."
Coalition sources said the UK Government's apparent shift was meant to show that it was being reasonable and willing to compromise in the hope that the First Minister would abandon any idea of proposing a second question on the independence referendum ballot paper.
Mr Cameron's spokesman argued that allowing 16 and 17-year-olds the vote in the Scottish poll would not set a precedent. "You are doing two different things," he said. "One is a referendum about the independence of a nation, which is irreversible. The other is the election that decides the government for the next four to five years. It is quite a big decision."
However, campaigners for lowering the voting age made clear a precedent would indeed be set.
Katie Ghose, chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society, which supports votes for 16 and 17-year-olds, told The Herald: "The argument for votes at 16 should be advanced on its own merits, not as part of some deal over the referendum. The Government has got to stop doing deals on important constitutional questions."
Grant Costello, chairman of the Scottish Youth Parliament, said: "We urge both Governments to seize the moment and make votes at 16 a reality."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article