The defence and security policy outlined in the Scottish Government's White Paper is decidedly cautious, one might say dull.
It deliberately eschews some of the more dramatic plans and ideas put forth at different times in the campaign, in what might be a deliberate attempt to assure the rest of the UK and Nato members that an independent Scotland would not represent a problem to European security.
The most interesting clarification has to do with the withdrawal of nuclear weapons from Scotland. The only mention of an eventual date for the withdrawal is the end of an independent Scotland's first parliament, which could be 2020, or six years after the referendum is held.
Even this is not put forward as a hard and fast deadline, but instead is spoken of as an expectation. In other words, the rest of the UK will be given time to decide how, or indeed whether, it will continue on as a nuclear power.
The other interesting element is that the Scottish defence force would start out relatively small, only reaching its expected size 10 years after independence.
In the first year of independence the entire armed forces of Scotland would number only 7500 and a few thousand reservists (the size by 2026 is expected to double this).
The equipment for this force will also be quite modest to start, all taken from pre-existing equipment in the British armed forces (highlighted by two Type 23 frigates and 12 Typhoon fast jets).
The Scottish Government is aiming at first for quite a small, and therefore less costly set of armed services which can fit within its £2.5 billion security budget target.
l Phillips O'Brien, is Reader in History at Glasgow University's School of Humanities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article