AN independent Scotland would have to pay billions of pounds more to be a member of the EU, senior UK ministers have claimed.
Foreign Secretary William Hague and Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander said it was inconceivable an independent Scotland would secure an EU budget rebate, as currently enjoyed by the UK.
They dismissed SNP claims an independent Scotland could join the EU seamlessly, and on improved terms, as they unveiled Whitehall's latest Scotland Analysis paper on the consequences of a Yes vote in September's referendum.
The 120-page study suggested EU membership could cost Scots households up to the equivalent of £210 per year if the country left the UK. Figures suggested an independent Scotland would have to pay between £1.9 billion and £3.8bn over and above its present share of UK contributions, over the 2014 to 2020 EU budget period.
The £1.9bn figure - equivalent to £750 per household - was based on a "most optimistic" case, the paper said, accepting Scottish Government claims an independent Scotland would secure an extra £850 million in agricultural subsidies. The £3.8bn - equivalent to £1470 per household - was a worst-case scenario, under which farm payments would fall by just over £1bn.
Mr Alexander told an invited audience of business leaders in Glasgow: "What this means for Scottish families is that over the next seven years continuing as part of the United Kingdom will save them at least £750 per household, possibly climbing to £1470 per household.
"So, as part of the UK we Scots pay less, and we get more out of our EU membership."
The Whitehall paper on EU and international issues, the ninth in the Scotland Analysis series, said SNP claims an independent Scotland could take a share of the UK's £3bn annual rebate were based on a misunderstanding.
It said the UK rebate would be cut to reflect the reduced size of the country in the event of Scottish independence, removing a "Scottish share".
Instead, the paper warned, an independent Scotland would end up having to contribute nearly £600m over the seven-year budget period towards the UK's rebate.
Mr Alexander added: "The bottom line is this: Scotland outside of the UK would have to negotiate its own way back into the European Union, and as such its terms of membership would be entirely different to those we currently enjoy. Scotland would be a net contributor to the EU, it would pay more than it would get back."
Foreign Secretary Mr Hague said negotiating EU membership terms was "unlikely to be as easy as the Scottish Government makes out".
He said an independent Scotland would have to negotiate hard and expend considerable "political capital" to resist pressure to join the euro single currency and the Schengen zone, the free travel area covering most of Europe apart from Britain and Ireland.
He also argued Scotland benefits from the UK's substantial network of diplomatic, consular and business support around the globe. He said: "The Scottish Government is offering a fraction of what Scotland already has. There are grave risks to independence."
He insisted it was a positive choice to support Scotland remaining in the UK.
Nicola Sturgeon, Deputy First Minister, said: "The fact is Scotland would receive £850m more in farm payments if we were an independent member of the EU."
She added: "William Hague is the latest in a series of Coalition ministers making flying visits to Scotland to lecture us on the dangers of independence. Yet none of them is actually prepared to debate - openly and directly - with Scottish ministers.
"More than ever Scotland needs direct representation in Europe so we can protect and promote Scotland's interests."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article