Labour leadership hopeful Andy Burnham has called for the Conservative's flagship high speed rail scheme to extend to Scotland.
The £50bn HS2 programme will link London and the north of England.
The Conservatives say that the railway line will speed up journeys from Scotland to London.
But Mr Burnham said the project should also cross the Border.
He also warned that the publication of the Chilcot report into the Iraq war would be a "sobering" moment for the Labour party that should impact on their future foreign policy.
And he broke with interim leader Harriet Harman to say the party should set out its opposition to parts of the package of benefit cuts unveiled by George Osborne.
Mr Burnham also said the party should vote against the Welfare Reform and Work Bill if the amendment is not passed.
But he appeared to indicate that he would not rebel if Ms Harman insists Labour MPs abstain in next week's vote.
The SNP have said they will vote against the welfare plans.
Mr Burnham insisted he was not "turning my face against welfare reform".
But he added he opposed parts of the Tory plans including to abolish measurements around child poverty.
Meanwhile Labour MP Stephen Kinnock has described plans to limit tax credits to two children as "awfully reminiscent of some kind of eugenics policy".
Ms Harman wants MPs to abstain in the Welfare Reform and Work Bill vote next week.
She argues that the move would allow the new party leader, due to be elected in September, to decide whether to oppose the tax credit element when it is debated in detail after the summer.
Mr Harman has also called on Labour to concentrate its fire on other parts of the Budget package - including cuts to tax credit and universal thresholds, maintenance loans for students from poor families, reductions to some disability payments and the abolition of child poverty targets.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article