LABOUR will take a positive, open-minded approach to the Smith Commission process but will not agree to Scotland's representation at Westminster being diluted in any way.
The crunch point as the cross-party talks get under way in earnest on Thursday in Edinburgh remains how much income tax powers should be transferred from London to Edinburgh.
While the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats propose virtually all of them should come north, Labour appears divided.
Today, writing in The Herald, Lord Smith of Kelvin acknowledges there is "substantial distance" between the respective parties' proposals but points out that for progress to be made there needs to be compromise.
The Crossbench peer stresses that not only politicians but also civic Scotland and the public have to be engaged and that a special session of the cross-party talks to discuss the latter will be held next month.
But Lord Smith makes clear the deadline of St Andrew's Day for agreement has to be met, noting: "That is what was offered to the people. That is what their political leaders must deliver."
At present, Labour's proposal is for increasing the power to vary income tax from 10p to 15p, meaning three-quarters of basic rate income tax in Scotland would be controlled by Holyrood. But it is now thought several senior figures, including Scottish leader Johann Lamont, want to go much further.
In contrast, Gordon Brown has spoken forcefully about not falling into the "Tory trap" of devolving all income tax powers as, he argues, this could limit Scottish MPs' participation in financial votes at Westminster, most notably the Budget, which would harm Scotland and the Union.
The vow, signed by all six party leaders north and south of the border, committed them to a stronger Scottish Parliament while retaining "full representation" for Scottish MPs in the House of Commons.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article