More than half of the people in the UK think Scotland's First Minister should take part in the TV leaders' debates in the run-up to the general election while almost two-thirds think the Greens should be involved, a new poll has revealed.
Research by YouGov showed that 53% of adults believe SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon should take part in the head-to-head showdowns in the run-up to the May 7 vote.
Meanwhile, 62% of the 1,684 people across the UK who were questioned want Green leader Natalie Bennett to participate.
In Scotland, two-thirds (66%) of those questioned thought Ms Sturgeon should be included in the debates, with slightly more people (69%) backing the inclusion of Ms Bennett.
Prime Minister David Cameron has already ruled out taking part in the election debates if the Green Party leader is left out - with both Labour and the UK Independence Party (Ukip) accusing him of running scared.
The SNP, which now has more party members than the Liberal Democrats, has previously called for its leader to be included in the main election debates.
With polls indicating the May 7 election could result in no party having an overall majority at Westminster, the nationalists believe they could potentially hold the balance of power across the UK.
SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson said: "This polling is very welcome and shows that south of the border and across the nations and regions of the UK people rightly recognise the need to have Nicola Sturgeon included in the televised debates.
"The YouGov poll also shows Labour, Tory, Lib Dem and major party voters in Scotland agree with Ms Sturgeon's inclusion to the debates - by a margin of nearly three to one when 'Don't Knows' are removed - which speaks volumes about the SNP's strong position ahead of May's general election.
"With a larger membership than the Lib Dems and Ukip combined, and more elected MPs than Ukip, the case for including the SNP is unanswerable.
"It would be ludicrous for the SNP to be shut out of these proposed debates - a position backed by voters north and south of the border - and that is something that should be accepted by all involved."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article