Alex Salmond believes he will get a second chance to hold an independence referendum and next time he thinks he will win, the former First Minister said.
An English vote to take the UK out of the European Union if Scots vote to stay could be the "tipping point" that brings about another poll, he told The Times.
Mr Salmond has previously said independence was a "once in a generation opportunity", but the 59-year-old MSP now believes he will see independence within his lifetime.
Unionists' "quasi-religious vow" of further devolution was the decisive factor in securing the No vote as it offered "power without risk", according to Mr Salmond, but he said the final offering in the Smith Commission is "a betrayal".
Mr Salmond also revealed the Queen was not "best pleased" with David Cameron when he was overheard boasting that she "purred" down the phone when the Prime Minister told her Scots had rejected independence.
Mr Salmond said: "A taxi driver said to me that he had voted No to independence but he would do it differently next time. I think we would win if there was another referendum."
He added: "Luckily in life, as in politics, people sometimes get a second chance."
Commenting on the proposed in/out referendum on the EU, Mr Salmond said: "If you believe there are four equal nations, partners in this United Kingdom, then it seems reasonable that no one country should be dragged out of the European firmament against its will."
Unionists "made an offer which sounded big but will be small" in their stylised countersigned "vow" of more devolution on the front page of the Daily Record, Mr Salmond said.
"It's ironic that the thing that really did for us was the poll showing we were ahead," he said.
"It prompted the 'vow' and that was the tipping point. For the swing voters, being offered power without risk was all it required.
"Putting a promise into a medieval manuscript and calling it a vow to give it a quasi-religious flavour shouldn't be important but it was.
"It was betrayal. It's presentation, not reality. It's still only 30% of tax revenues."
Mr Salmond had an audience with the Queen the day after Mr Cameron was caught on camera discussing her post-referendum reaction with former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Mr Salmond said: "I wouldn't say she was best pleased. That was just dreadful.
"Cameron's a schoolboy. This is a guy showing off because he's with a billionaire. It's pathetic. In fact it's worse than pathetic, it's demeaning."
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said: "The former first minister has broken his word to the Scottish people.
"Alex Salmond said the referendum was a once in a generation opportunity. But now, if he gets his way, another one will be just round the corner. It beggars belief that within weeks of losing the last referendum he is boasting of a victory in the next one.
"I am sure people will be puzzled that Alex Salmond is rubbishing the Smith Commission which is transferring big welfare and tax powers to Scotland. It is odd as his party signed up to the package of powers.
"The SNP took their eye off the ball during the referendum and cancer targets were missed, college places were slashed and hospitals went into crisis. Backing Alex Salmond's plans for another referendum is not in Scotland's interest."
Labour's Shadow Scottish Secretary, Margaret Curran MP, said: "While Alex Salmond repeats his call for another referendum, poverty in Scotland is still too high and the life chances of our children are still determined more by their postcode than their potential.
"Instead of focussing on the debate we've just had, Alex Salmond and the SNP should be talking about how we make Scotland the fairest country on earth and how we can use the powers that we have, and the ones we are about to take control of, to tackle poverty and disadvantage."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article