The SNP will propose another independence referendum in its manifesto for re-election to Holyrood next year, according to a former deputy leader of the party.
Jim Sillars said the tens of thousands of new members who joined the SNP in the wake of the No vote in last year's referendum will expect a commitment to another referendum "when we think the time is right" to secure a victory.
The referendum "could be within a short period or within two or three years", Mr Sillars said.
The nationalist veteran, husband of the late SNP trailblazer Margo MacDonald, also expects the SNP to demand the constitutional right to hold another referendum at the time of the Scottish Parliament's choosing in exchange for supporting a minority Labour government.
"I cannot believe that there will not be a commitment to independence and a referendum in an SNP manifesto next year, with the timing of the referendum to be left to a decision when we think the time is right," he said.
"Now, that could be within a short period or within two or three years, one doesn't know, you have to wait and see what the dynamics of the politics are.
"The important thing is that next time there is a referendum we pick the time when we are going to win.
"I would hope that one of the demands that are made on a minority Labour government by the SNP keeping them in office is that they transfer the constitution from schedule 5 of the 1998 Act from Westminster to Holyrood."
The last referendum had to be signed off by Westminster in the Edinburgh Agreement under current constitutional law.
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon has said she will know in her gut when the time is right for another referendum and the decision "will be down to not what the SNP wants, or what the SNP thinks is right, but what I think is right for Scotland and what I think the people of Scotland want".
She also said SNP members are a "pragmatic bunch" who understand that another referendum cannot be rushed.
Mr Sillars said: "My view of a pretty pragmatic bunch, who joined the party in their tens of thousands, is that, like me, as a member we would want a clear commitment to independence and another referendum at a pragmatic time in the manifesto next year."
He said there will be "no talk of sanctions whatsoever" if Ms Sturgeon decides to withhold a commitment to another referendum next year.
"We've got 100,000 people, it's a democratic party, there is a national conference to come and national councils to come when the membership will express its point of view and the leaders will express their point of view, and I am hopeful that they coincide," he said.
"No one inside the SNP is at war with each other or Nicola Sturgeon.
"I understand that the media is absolutely desperate to get something that would indicate anxiety within the SNP.
"There isn't any on my part. I have expressed an opinion and I am happy to stand by that opinion. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am."
Speaking at First Minister's Questions, Ms Sturgeon said: "Let me make it quite clear, I've got the greatest of respect for Jim Sillars but the clue is in his title, former deputy leader of the SNP.
"I'm the current leader of the SNP so let me say it clearly once again. This election is not about independence. It's not about a referendum. It's about making Scotland's voice heard."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article