NICOLA Sturgeon has defended the Scottish Government's decision to drop the controversial proposal to abolish the centuries-old legal requirement of corroboration in criminal trials, insisting it was the "responsible and sensible thing" to do.
At First Minister's Questions, Tory leader Ruth Davidson branded the Government's handling of the issue "one of the most shameful episodes in this Parliament's history".
Ms Davidson said that when "legitimate concerns" about axing corroboration had been raised last year, the then justice secretary Kenny MacAskill had "dismissed them as being part of a unionist conspiracy and accused opponents of 'selling out the victims of crime'". She also cited an intervention from former solicitor general Lord McCluskey, who said that the SNP's handling of the episode "rings alarm bells for anyone concerned about democracy in Scotland."
However, Ms Sturgeon defended her former justice secretary, who had previously said that the "outdated rule", which means two sources of evidence are needed to secure a conviction, meant many victims were being denied justice.
Mr MacAskill's successor, Michael Matheson, announced this week that the proposal to end the need for corroboration, which had won the support of victims groups and police but was strongly opposed by many in the legal profession, would be removed from legislation currently before the Scottish Parliament.
Ms Sturgeon said: "The former justice secretary listened to the concerns that had been raised, which is why he then asked Lord Bonomy to carry out the work Lord Bonomy has now carried out.
"They have recommended a range of changes to the justice system they think should go ahead if corroboration is to be abolished, and the current Justice Secretary has rightly and properly decided we need to take a pause and consider those reforms, the substantive nature of them and the way they would change the justice system, in a round and in a holistic way.
"I take the view that the SNP Government has handled this both appropriately and correctly but also we can evidence, because of the position we're now in, that concerns have been raised and have not been swept aside. On the contrary, they have been listened to and acted upon."
However, speaking after she clashed with Ms Sturgeon in Holyrood, Ms Davidson repeated calls for the SNP to perform a u-turn over its plan to introduce a state-appointed 'named person' for every child.
She said: "Corroboration was not an isolated case - it was part of a pattern of a majority SNP government steamrolling through ill-thought out plans without a care for rational or reasoned argument. But now the Scottish Government has shown it is willing to listen on at least some things, the First Minister now has to consider the named person plans too."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article