The First Minister has won praise for slapping down a cybernat idiot who said political journalist David Clegg should be hanged. Nicola Sturgeon took to Twitter to say: "Comments like that are totally unacceptable. Robust debate, yes. Abuse like that, no." Well said, chorused the rest of Twitter.
///
The Pub Landlord - also known as comedian Al Murray - pledged to appoint Alex Salmond First Minister of Norwich "so he really knows what it's like to be ignored by the rest of Britain". This, of course, was part of his manifesto for the voters of Thanet South, where he will challenge that well known pub regular Nigel Farage at the general election. His chances? Bookies Paddy Power made The Pub Landlord a 50/1 shot, Hills made him an even bigger outsider at 80/1.
///
The SNP attempted to rewrite history this week with regards to its treatment time guarantee.
The flagship law, introduced by Nicola Sturgeon as health secretary, offers a "legal guarantee to give certainty" to patients that they would receive operations within 12 weeks. Or so we were told when it came into force back in 2012.
But after it emerged that health boards had breached the legislation more than 12,000 times, it now appears this cast-iron promise enshrined in law had been just another NHS target all along.
"That 98 per cent of patients have been treated within the twelve week target is testament to the fantastic work of our NHS staff," backbencher Bob Doris claimed in a party press release.
The Unspun team is delighted - by Bob's logic, presumably that means we only have to follow the Government's tougher drink drive limit on 49 mornings out of 50?
///
The referendum has been responsible for a series of terms entering the political lexicon. Indyref even went mainstream, making it into the dictionary.
Most are harmless. But one led to groans emanating from Unspun office this week that must have echoed through the corridors of Holyrood. We came across an online campaigner for independence who saw fit to proudly proclaim himself a "JedAye".
Do you know of a more cringeworthy term inspired by Scotland's constitutional future? Tweet us @Unspunherald and let us know.
///
Nicola Sturgeon tried being down with the kids while giving a talk at a girls school in Glasgow.
She said as well as the TV, phone and penicillin Scots invented cool stuff, like video games and asked who plays Grand Theft Auto?
Stony silence and not a single hand went up. Then she realised the teachers were all at the back watching closely.
"You're probably not allowed to admit to that." She quickly recovered.
///
Nat MSP Joan McAlpine sparked a minor furore this week by choosing to use her weekly newspaper column to attack councils.
As well as suggesting that non-SNP councils were corrupt and that anyone who wanted to transfer power from Edinburgh wanted to "bring down Holyrood", she also claimed the Scottish Parliament had a greater "democratic mandate" than local authorities. The evidence she cited for this was that Holyrood elections "attract more voters than councils, where turnout is under 40 per cent."
She has a point - the last Scottish Parliamentary election had a 50 per cent turnout. But then, in the last General Election, more than 65 per cent of voters cast a ballot. So there you have it - Westminster has a greater democratic mandate than Holyrood, according to Joan McAlpine.
///
Much debate over the rights and wrongs of the House of Lords this week following haggis-gate.
Interestingly the issue itself is alive and well (no sniggers at the back) among peers themselves.
Last week they debated a motion from a backbencher arguing for a "reduction in the number of Peers attending the House each day without recourse to primary legislation".
Lord Williams of Elvel told fellow peers that daily attendance had risen from 388 to 497.
As he pointed out that means at certain times, those who are they quite literally cannot all fit in the chamber.
But his colleagues may be less pleased with him pointing out that voting lobbies are frequently "too crowded for comfort".
A case for more haggis not less?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article