Tom Gordon
FIRST Minister’s Questions is usually rich in laughter, some of it intended, some not.
But occasionally there is a week when no one is laughing, and no one should be.
Day-to-day matters of policing, the BBC and GM crops all popped up today, but all were eclipsed by the Syrian refugee crisis.
Like the nation, the proceedings were haunted by the image of a toddler facedown in the surf of a Turkish beach, the double-victim of war and political paralysis.
This hellish inversion of a universal holiday snap - a child at the seaside, but drowned instead of playing - had many MSPs close to tears.
Labour’s Kezia Dugdale spoke of “women in the sea desperately trying to keep their babies afloat, fellow human beings left to suffocate in the backs of lorries” as she urged action.
Nicola Sturgeon, her voice cracking, said she had been “reduced to tears” by the boy’s picture.
She was also angry at the “walk-by-on-the-other-side approach of the UK government”.
Its refusal to join EU resettlement efforts was “utterly shameful” - the Tories’ tough line on immigration was “getting in the way of a human response to a humanitarian crisis”, she said.
“We simply cannot walk by on the other side: otherwise that little boy… will just become one of many, many more. We cannot and must not have that on their consciences.”
Labour’s Patricia Ferguson, failing not to cry, was equally eloquent as she castigated David Cameron for turning his back “on the most desperate people on the planet”.
Ms Sturgeon’s rhetoric peaked as she urged the Prime Minister to show some basic compassion and leadership instead of pandering to xenophobia.
Then he might “demonstrate that the proud traditions that Britain has in welcoming refugees have not died in the depths of a Tory debate about immigration, they are alive and well.
“This is a welcoming country and will not turn its back on people who need us.”
It was a sombre, moving, impressive show of collective will in which almost all parties joined the applause; only the Conservative MSPs stayed silent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel