THE weather has been awful.
Even from the steamed-up windows of the member's restaurant, MSPs cannot help but to have noticed the storms lashing against the concrete panels, wooden poles and oddly shaped decorative panels that constitute Holyrood's protective outer casing.
We have been warned about these wetter and wilder winters as a consequence of global warming.
But it wasn't a gloomy realisation that the parliament has been battered by the elements for days on end that prompted Kezia Dugdale to raise the issue of climate change during First Minister's Questions.
Oh no. It was the fact the First Minister is off to Paris on Monday to hob nob with world leaders at the UN climate summit.
The FM will take part in debates, attend a business event and conduct "high level bi-laterals" as her spokesman put it with a bit of a flourish.
If that sounds like a meeting to you, it sounds ominously like grandstanding to Ms Dugdale and her Scottish Labour colleagues who would dearly love to be over there grandstanding themselves. Nicola is going green in Paris and Labour is green with envy.
So Ms Dugdale went for the climate jugular, the awkward fact that while the Scottish Government has some of the toughest targets in the world to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it hasn't actually met them. Ever.
"Will she remember to tell the world?" prodded the Scottish Labour leader.
Unwisely, Ms Sturgeon responded with honesty and hard facts, explaining patiently to MSPs how the targets had been missed because they had been made even tougher as a result of new scientific evidence.
But the more she burbled earnestly about "10,000 mega-tonnes of carbon" the more the Labour backbenchers groaned.
"This is actually factual information," she pleaded, but to no avail.
"There is more spin in that answer than the average wind turbine," chuckled Ms Dugdale.
But, as usual, it was the First Minister who had the last laugh.
She revealed she would be travelling to Paris by train, not the polluting plane of Ms Dugdale's imagination, and her backbenchers fell about. In gales of laughter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here