So Alistair Carmichael has survived the headline court challenge to oust him as MP for Orkney and Shetland. But he is not yet out of the woods, so to speak.
The court found he had told a blatant lie but, on a legal point, was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that it could properly be characterised as a false statement of fact in relation to the MP's "personal character or conduct".
The former Secretary of State would have heaved a sigh of relief at what he believes was a politically motivated attempt by the SNP to unseat him from Westminster while his critics will believe the judgement is flawed and that their outrage over so-called "Frenchgate" will continue.
Despite his victory, Mr Carmichael has been damaged by the court case. To be called a liar in open court is hardly a positive development and will be something his opponents can and probably will use from here until election day.
The process has been difficult for the MP but he has a thick skin; the biggest affect has been on his family.
Mr Carmichael has said the court case marked the "unhealthy polarisation of Scottish politics since the referendum" and anyone who bothers to read Twitter or online comments will have difficulty in disagreeing that the tone of British politics has, in places, been lowered to a worrying level. Witness the fall-out to the Syria debate with MPs getting death threats let alone nasty online abuse.
But the ex-Cabinet Minister is not yet free from the shadow of expulsion.
Kathryn Hudson, the parliamentary commissioner for standards, is investigating Frenchgate and Mr Carmichael's role within it.
But this throws up another conundrum. Why is she investigating the Lib Dem, when at the time, he was not an MP? The controversy occurred after Parliament was dissolved for the General Election. Her remit is to look into the behaviour of MPs. When I tried to find out the reason for this, the commissioner's office drew up the drawbridge and said she did not comment on her investigations in any regard.
So, we have to wait. It is likely Mr Carmichael and his family will spend Christmas with the shadow still over them. Ms Hudson's report to the standards committee could come before then but is likely to be early in the New Year.
But, of course, the former Secretary of State will have a defence if the standards watchdog finds against him; namely, he was not a member of parliament at the time, so any negative finding will be nugatory.
Yet this will not stop his opponents from using Frenchgate to seek to undermine him whenever they please.
The Carmichael saga grinds on.
Loading...
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel