THE bedroom tax and benefit sanctions are disproportionately affecting Scotland's most vulnerable citizens, Housing and Welfare Minister Margaret Burgess has said.
Mrs Burgess has requested an urgent meeting with the UK Government Minister for Welfare Reform, Lord Freud, to discuss her concerns around the impacts of benefit sanctions and bedroom tax, which she said were "unnecessarily harsh" on vulnerable people.
In a letter to the UK Government, Mrs Burgess said: "When it comes to the bedroom tax, it's clear that the policy is costing more than it is saving in Scotland.
"The apparent savings to the Department for Work and Pensions are simply because the costs are being pushed on to other stakeholders.
"There was no justification in introducing the bedroom tax to reduce housing benefit expenditure in the Scottish social rented sector, especially when you see the financial and social costs borne by some of our most vulnerable households.
"It's also clear to see there is no legitimate economic and social case for its imposition.
"Local authorities, Citizens Advice Bureaux and other advisory groups have all reported an increase in callers who have seen their benefits reduced or withdrawn.
"Foodbanks in Scotland have named benefit delays and changes, including sanctions, as major factors in the increasing demand for their services."
Mrs Burgess pointed to the latest estimate from council umbrella body Cosla, which found the annual costs of implementing the penalty exceed the savings by £10 million.
The Scottish Government announced in October that an extra £20m would be allocated to local authorities in 2014/2015 to help households struggling with the bedroom tax.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article