Tony Blair's former chief of staff has defended his decision to meet with an on-the-run republican terror suspect as part of peace negotiations in Northern Ireland.
Jonathan Powell said yesterday holding talks with "distasteful" people was often necessary to broker deals as he explained his encounter with senior Sinn Fein figure Rita O'Hare in Dublin more than 14 years ago.
Ms O'Hare, Sinn Fein's representative to the United States, is one of the most high-profile fugitive republicans, having skipped bail to the Irish Republic in 1972 after her arrest in connection with the attempted murder of a soldier.
Mr Powell was giving evidence to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee inquiry into the contentious government scheme that saw letters sent to on-the-run republicans assuring them they were able to return to the UK as the authorities were not seeking them.
Ms O'Hare was unable to obtain one of the letters as she is still subject to an outstanding arrest warrant.
Mr Powell was also quizzed on a comment he had made during a meeting with Sinn Fein to the effect that Ms O'Hare should not travel to Belfast as it might result in her arrest.
Conservative committee member Oliver Colvile questioned why he had not asked that Ms O'Hare return to Northern Ireland to go through due process.
Explaining why he had told her not to return, Mr Powell said: "Had she come back, been arrested feeling she had fallen into a trap by me trapping her into coming back, the peace process would have been dead - it would have been a very bad idea."
Mr Powell, who said Ms O'Hare was a strong supporter of the peace process, denied he had de-prioritised justice.
"In the Good Friday Agreement we had provisions on releasing prisoners, I find that extremely distasteful to release prisoners after only two years -people who had murdered people - but it was a necessary part of the agreement, it's a balance of an agreement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article