Business Secretary Sajid Javid has overruled civil service warnings that parts of the controversial sell-off of the Royal Mail are a bad deal for taxpayers.
It comes after officials cautioned that plans to give Royal Mail staff an extra one per cent of shares free would not represent value for money.
But Mr Javid ordered the policy to go ahead anyway by an unusual process called a 'letter of direction.'
It involves the top civil servant in a department putting his objections in writing. In turn the Secretary of State writes to order the policy be implemented.
Martin Donnelly, the permanent secretary at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, said in the document that he had concluded that "while a decision to allocate more shares to Royal Mail staff ... is an entirely legitimate policy it does not provide a tangible return to the taxpayer and so is not value for money as defined in the legislation".
In response Mr Javid wrote that he noted the concerns, but added that he had taken into account the "wider benefits" of the policy.
He also said that there was "merit" in rewarding Royal Mail employees for their hard work and that staff formed an "important part" of the company's shareholder base.
In 2010 Jonathan Baume, the head of the civil service union First Division Association said that asking for a 'letter of direction' was regarded as a "nuclear option" by officials.
Chancellor George Osborne has already faced accusations he is selling Royal Mail shares off too cheaply.
The SNP and Labour have also warned that plans to sell off all of the Government's stake in the Royal Mail could mean the end of the Universal Service Obligation, which guarantees delivery six days a week to any address in the UK for the same price.
The Conservative Government said the promise is written into law.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article