THERE was an almighty roar in the Commons chamber for Nick Clegg yesterday.
As the Liberal Democrat leader stood up to deputise for David Cameron at Prime Ministers' Questions (PMQs), MPs on all sides of the house hollered and bellowed.
On Labour's part they smelled blood and were keen to exploit what they hoped would be divisions between Mr Clegg's stance and that of Mr Cameron, absent from the chamber on a three-day trip to China.
After all, on a previous occasion at PMQs, Mr Clegg had attacked what he described as the "illegal war" in Iraq - not exactly the terms the Conservative leader would have used.
On the government side, there was a good turn out from the Tories to show their support for their Coalition colleague.
Conservative MPs would not have been there for another reason, would they?
For Mr Clegg it appeared at one point as if the adage was: beware Tories bearing gifts. One of the first questions lobbed at him from those allegedly on his side saw him forced into a defence of the bedroom tax, a policy a number of Lib Dem MPs voted against, although it is supported by the party leadership.
The Conservatives roared again at that one.
But a subtle change began to happen when Labour got its chance to ask questions of the Deputy Prime Minister.
If there is one person that Tories hate more than Mr Clegg, it is Harriet Harman.
The Labour deputy leader at one point could barely get out two words at a time without being drowned out by the noise in the chamber.
But she did appear to be successful in her attempts to elicit some tensions within the Coalition.
In response to a question on the economy, Mr Clegg declared that "without the Lib Dems there would not be a recovery".
That triggered a round of enthusiastic head nodding from the Conservatives on the government frontbench.
Among the Tory rank and file, however, there was merely stony faces and rather a lack of cheering.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article