LABOUR has been accused of "rank hypocrisy" after 47 of its MPs failed to vote on its key Westminster motion, demanding the so-called bedroom tax be scrapped immediately.
Gordon Brown, the former Prime Minister, Anas Sarwar, the deputy Scottish Labour leader, Douglas Alexander, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, and Jim Murphy, the Shadow International Development Secretary, were among 10 of the party's Scots MPs who did not vote.
Some 21 Liberal Democrats also did not vote, including Scots Danny Alexander, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, former party leader Charles Kennedy and fellow backbenchers Alan Reid and Michael Crockart. Some LibDems are believed to have abstained in protest.
Labour had made great play about securing the Commons debate and the vote on a policy which it has staunchly opposed and said it would scrap if it won power in 2015.
During the debate Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, decried the "pernicious effect" on vulnerable and in many cases disabled people of what the UK Government officially terms the spare room subsidy.
At the end of Tuesday night's debate, Labour's motion was lost by just 26 votes. The Herald was told as many as 24 Labour MPs were able to avoid voting by getting paired with a Coalition minister.
Angus Robertson, the SNP leader at Westminster, claimed the absence of so many Labour MPs was a dereliction of duty by the Opposition given that it had for months raised the profile of the issue and boasted it had secured a Commons debate. "This is rank hypocrisy from Labour," he said.
His colleague Eilidh Whiteford, who is the SNP welfare spokeswoman, called on Labour to explain why so many of its MPs were absent.
"Some may have very good reasons for missing the vote but there can be no excuse for a quarter of Scotland's Labour MPs not turning up for a vote to scrap the bedroom tax that could have been won."
She added: "It is now clearer than ever before that only with a Yes vote will we finally be able to get rid of the unjust bedroom tax and have a welfare state that reflects the views and votes of the people of Scotland."
Meanwhile, Citizens Advice Scotland claims in a report out today that sick and disabled Scots are bearing the brunt of the bedroom tax. It says 82,000 households are being hit, forcing people to move home or see their benefits cut if they have a spare bedroom. Eight out of 10 of these people are disabled, the report stresses.
"The bedroom tax in reality is having just the impact many feared it would; it is causing huge distress and pain, principally with people who were already suffering severe hardship," says Margaret Lynch, CAS chief executive.
In a separate development, the Department for Work and Pensions released figures showing 75,662 people in Scotland had seen their benefits reduced following the introduction of "government-reduced subsidies".
The highest area was Glasgow with 13,468 people affected. Others included North Lanarkshire (6384), Fife (5688), Edinburgh (4999). At 103, Orkney had the lowest.
Lord Freud, the Welfare Reform Minister, said having 2.1 million households on the social housing waiting list due to a shortage of suitable properties was unfair and the system had to be changed to help those families who were "crammed into accommodation that was too small".
Last night, a Labour spokesman said: "This desperate smear by the SNP cannot hide the fact that only three LibDem and Tory MPs voted to abolish the bedroom tax immediately. Only a One Nation Labour Government will axe this cruel tax."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article