NICK Clegg and Theresa May have become embroiled in an unseemly row with the Deputy Prime Minister launching a stinging attack on the Home Secretary for claiming he had put children at risk by blocking the so-called snoopers' charter.
The allegation, which came during Mrs May's speech at this week's Conservative Party conference, was branded "outrageous" by the Liberal Democrat leader, who said it represented a "new low in Coalition relations". He demanded an apology.
But the bickering continued when a Home Office source laughed off Mr Clegg's demand, reportedly saying: "Nick Clegg is a w******."
In response, a LibDem source - on the eve of the party's own autumn conference in Glasgow - hit back, saying: "Making deeply misleading claims about public safety and resorting to playground insults when challenged is a disappointing way for politics to be conducted.
"Let's deal in facts."
The spat, coming just months from the General Election, is perhaps the clearest sign yet that, psychologically at least, the Tories and the LibDems are decoupling themselves ahead of the May 7 poll.
In her keynote speech, the Secretary of State said she had proposed the snoopers' charter because the inability of police and intelligence services to monitor internet and phone use was creating a "crisis in national security".
She claimed the National Crime Agency had been forced to drop at least 20 cases because of missing communications data, including 13 "threat-to-life cases" involving children.
Accusing the LibDems of being "outrageously irresponsible" for torpedoing the legislation, Mrs May made clear a future Conservative government would introduce the measures.
But on his regular London radio phone-in, the DPM accused his Conservative Cabinet colleague of appalling behaviour, suggesting she was the one putting children at risk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article