ED Miliband is too weak to sack "nightmare" Ed Balls, senior Conservative Grant Shapps said after leaked emails revealed apparent Labour tensions.
The Tory chairman said Mr Miliband's adviser's disparaging analysis of the shadow chancellor proved that Labour could not be trusted on the economy.
Mr Shapps said the emails, in which one of the Labour leader's advisers calls Mr Balls's response to optimistic economic growth forecasts a "nightmare", showed Labour had not moved on from the in-fighting seen in the Tony Blair and Gordon Brown years.
He said: "Miliband never wanted Balls in the post, but if he's too weak to sack his 'nightmare' shadow chancellor, then he is too weak to cut the deficit, too weak to fix the welfare system and too weak to stand up for ordinary hard-working people. Once again we're seeing in-fighting between a Labour leader and his shadow chancellor."
In the emails, obtained by a Sunday newspaper, Mr Miliband's adviser Torsten Bell describes Mr Balls's response to this week's optimistic growth, jobs and inflation forecasts from the Bank of England as a "nightmare".
Mr Bell seemed to take issue with the briefing from the shadow chancellor's camp which argued for a "recovery built to last" and focused on "cost of living" and an "economy that works for working people".
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the Labour Party and its front bench was more united than it has been in 20 years. He said the media was "scraping the barrel" over the emails.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article