GEORGE Osborne has insisted a future Tory government would not need to raise VAT to balance the nation's books but failed to give a "cast-iron guarantee" to match Labour's pledge not to increase the consumption tax over the five years of the next Parliament.
Labour insist the Conservatives harbour a "secret plan" to raise VAT if they won the General Election and the Chancellor, appearing before the Commons Treasury Committee to answer questions on the Budget, was pressed repeatedly to rule one out by Opposition backbenchers John Mann and Andy Love. The former, who represents Bassetlaw in Nottinghamshire, challenged Mr Osborne four times to give a "cast-iron guarantee" to rule out putting up VAT.
Insisting he did not intend to raise the tax, the Chancellor said: "I have identified where the £30bn of savings need to come from and they don't involve a VAT rise.
"The question for those who say they are going to try to balance the books but say it mainly has to be done through tax, as the official Opposition does, is to spell out what those big tax rises are. And it's pretty clear today they have opened the door to a big increase in National Insurance and the 'jobs tax' and it would be very, very damaging for this country," added Mr Osborne.
Earlier, Ed Balls, his Labour Shadow, announced Labour would pledge not to raise VAT in the next parliament and pointed out how in 2010 the Tories before the election said they had no plans to raise the consumption tax and then did so once they got into power.
"Now history is repeating itself all over again," declared Mr Balls. "It's the same Tory lie about VAT: 1979, 1992, 2010 and now 2015. Everybody in the country knows what it means: the Tories have a secret plan to raise VAT again," claimed the Shadow Chancellor.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article