NICOLA Sturgeon has been accused of double standards by the Conservative leadership, which has dismissed her proposal of a "double majority" on any EU referendum vote and made clear that, if the Tories won power on May 7, there would be a single UKwide vote.
The First Minister has argued that there should be a "democratic safeguard" in any future EU referendum, so that if England voted for the UK to leave, then this should only happen if Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland agreed. If any one of other three parts of what she called "the family of nations" voted for the UK to stay in the Brussels bloc, then it should do so.
"I will be pressing that case in order to make sure that no part of the UK could be taken out of the EU against its will," she recently argued.
But Grant Shapps, the Tory Chairman, at a campaign event in London, dismissed the SNP leader's proposal, saying: "Nicola Sturgeon is very keen on this double-lock situation where Scotland would also have to vote for leaving the EU with England.
"I didn't hear her make that same argument about the Scottish referendum, did you? I never heard her say Scotland could have independence but only if England, Wales and Northern Ireland voted the same way."
Stressing how he "did not buy" the Nationalist argument, Mr Shapps added: "We are a United Kingdom. There are reserved powers. They include international affairs. It's absolutely right there should be a single vote, which is exactly what will happen by the end of 2017, if the Conservatives win this election."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article