ED Miliband should "actively consider" reopening Labour's inquiry into alleged vote-rigging in Falkirk,former foreign secretary Jack Straw has said.
Mr Straw made clear he did not think the issue was going to go away and said there was "a sufficient case...for there to be further questions which will need to be dealt with".
His remarks came after the revelation that a dossier of 1000 emails had been handed to police purporting to show how Unite had plotted to undermine Labour's internal investigation into claims the union had sought to cram the Falkirk Labour Party with its supporters to ensure its preferred candidate won a local selection. Unite strenuously denies any wrongdoing. On Monday, Stevie Deans, a union official, resigned following an investigation by Ineos, owner of the Grangemouth petrochemical plant, into claims he used company time to work for Labour.
Mr Straw said the Falkirk row ran into the "catastrophic tactics" employed by Unite at Grangemouth. Last week, the union, having strongly opposed the management survival plan, performed a U-turn to accept it and in so doing helped save the jobs of 800 workers.
But the Labour grandee attacked Unite's strategy, saying: "Len McCluskey(the union General Secretary) downwards put internal Unite politics before the interests of their members at the Grangemouth plant."
Mr Straw stressed how he felt sure Mr Miliband would now look "very carefully" into whether the party's own inquiry should be reopened.
Meantime, Labour swept aside a claim by independent Falkirk MP Eric Joyce that it was keeping Mr Deans as chairman of Falkirk CLP out of fear of the Unite leadership. A senior Labour source, said the party HQ had no remit on the selection of local chairmen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article