Silviniaco Conti proved himself a worthy heir to the incredible Kauto Star in triumphing in the Betfair Chase at Haydock yesterday.
While it is fanciful to believe the six-year-old can reach the same heights as last year's winner, the 7-4 shot leapt to second-favourite for the Gold Cup with most bookmakers under a typically well-judged front-running ride from Ruby Walsh that left champion trainer Paul Nicholls beaming.
Last year's Cheltenham Gold Cup winner Long Run, the 11-8 favourite, came second, with The Giant Bolster (15/2) third.
Nicholls confirmed the Gold Cup is the intention and suggested Silviniaco Conti may not run again until then. "I said if he won today we'd go for the Gold Cup and that is the plan," Nicholls said.
"You couldn't leave him in his box on Gold Cup day after that performance. But he wants to be fresh and I'm not going to run him through the winter in the mud."
Walsh partnered four-time winner Kauto Star – who led the runners down to the start, to great applause from the Haydock crowd – to both of his Gold Cup victories and is hopeful Silviniaco Conti can give him the hat-trick.
Walsh said: "The Gold Cup looks the logical step. You win the Charlie Hall, you win the Betfair, it's the obvious target for him. He's a good stayer, he's not slow. I'd love to ride another Gold Cup winner."
It was clear from when the tapes dropped no-one that was overly keen to make the running, so Walsh let his mount set what was a fairly sedate gallop for the first circuit. Silviniaco Conti injected more pace into the race heading down the back straight for the second time and some fast and accurate jumping kept him in charge.
Long Run, who was left chasing Kauto Star's shadow 12 months ago, travelled with more zest thid time and was right on the leader's tail turning in, but Silviniaco Conti galloped all the way to the line after the final fence to win by two-and-a-half lengths. The Giant Bolster just held on take third ahead of Weird Al.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article