ENGLAND'S World Cup Group D opponents have approached Scotland about providing part of their preparations for taking on the Auld Enemy in Brazil, the Sunday Herald understands.
Although nothing will be formalised until the draw for Euro 2016 is made in Nice in February, Italy, Uruguay and Costa Rica are all thought be interested in taking on British-style opposition in late May/early June as they build up to the showpiece and Gordon Strachan's side could fit the bill.
With a mooted trip to Australia now thought to be unlikely, a training camp in the USA is one potential venue for the fixtures.
Especially since Costa Rica, who Scotland haven't played since infamously going down to the Central American nation in the 1990 World Cup, and Italy are both scheduled to warm up for the tournament in the US.
Uruguay will do their preparations elsewhere, but a friendly with Scotland - with whom they saw a proposed fixture fall through in November due to their involvement in a one-sided play-off against Jordan - is one option being pursued.
Although broadcasters and rights holders are keeping cards close to their chests, Strachan and the SFA administrators are sifting through up to 20 different options, including the possibility of taking on another fixture in London, similar to the 2-0 defeat to Brazil at the Emirates, or elsewhere in Europe.
"There are teams competing in the World Cup that want to play against British opposition and we've options to play them in Europe or elsewhere between here and Brazil," said Stewart Regan, the SFA chief executive.
"We're exploring them, but there are financial factors as well as travel for players and fans to consider. There are 10 days immediately after the Champions League final on May 24 when we can't play.
"But we're looking at options to play as soon as we can to get the players together. We're not in a position to announce but it shouldn't be too long," Regan added.
"There are balls in the air and myself, Gordon and our commercial director are trying to finalise what the plans might look like before getting board approval."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article