Manchester City manager Manuel Pellegrini does not believe transfers such as Juan Mata's impending switch to Manchester United should be allowed mid-season.
Spanish playmaker Mata appears set to join United in a club-record move from Chelsea.
Pellegrini has no issue with United strengthening their squad during this month's transfer window - as they are entitled to do - but he is against the principle of big-money moves during the campaign.
The Chilean said: "I think Juan Mata is a very good player.
"It is a shame he didn't play often this year at Chelsea. I think United are buying a very good player.
"Personally I don't agree that the player can go from one team to another team in the same league at this part of the year, but rules are rules and he can change clubs."
When asked why he did not agree, Pellegrini, speaking at a press conference, said: "Because I think if a player plays for a club for more than half of the season, a club with money can take the best players from the other teams.
"But the rules allow it, so (there is) nothing to say."
Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger believes this move highlights how the January transfer window is an unfair concept.
There is a feeling that Chelsea will doubly benefit because Mata cannot play against them this season.
Chelsea have already played United twice this term while he would be ineligible were they to meet in the Champions League.
United do, however, still have to play some of Chelsea's title rivals in City, Arsenal and Liverpool.
But Pellegrini said: "I am not talking about the reasons of Arsene Wenger. I am not talking about that.
"Maybe Manchester United have an advantage because Chelsea wanted to sell him. Maybe Manchester United have an advantage in this case.
"I am talking about general reasons and not the specific reason that they have played already against them.
"I think in this transfer window, players that play more than five or six games for the same club cannot change to another."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article