With the possible exception of Mark Hateley, who havers that everything is "just the luck of the draw", most agree that Rangers have an unfair advantage in their looming Scottish Cup semi-final at Ibrox against Dundee United.
Ibrox, a "neutral" venue? This is a botch, born of the unavailability of Hampden Park due to the Commonwealth Games, which the SFA has failed to handle.
Why, in their haste, the SFA decided as far back as October that Ibrox must be the Scottish Cup semi-final venue, without knowing who would be in the last four, remains a mystery.
Even George Peat, a former SFA president, has gone on record as saying the SFA's thought-process on it has left him baffled.
In an ideal world, this cup semi-final would be played at Celtic Park, with a 50/50 split of tickets. But in Scottish football we are long past idealism.
Ibrox has a capacity of 51,000. Dundee United are unlikely to be able to shift 25,000 tickets for the match. So the Tannadice club, amid its warring with the SFA, will have to settle for around half of that and get on with it.
This fixture is one to relish yet most are left with a feeling of dissatisfaction at the right royal mess surrounding it. Well, it is done now. And the rightful, widespread public sympathy for Dundee United's plight cannot go wholly unchallenged.
Rangers have a season-ticket fanbase of around 43,000…do they not have rights, too? Do these supporters, who turn up week in, week out to watch their team, not have a greater right to a cup ticket than those Dundee United "fans" who are dragged out once a year for the big occasion?
In fact, at Ibrox on April 12, Dundee United will probably have in the region of 12,000 backing their team. Amid all the acrimony and fall-out, this is still pretty decent. It is significantly more, for instance, than Celtic are allowed to bring to Govan for an Old Firm clash.
Meanwhile, Stephen Thompson, the Dundee United chairman, has kept up his vital role in recent days of being the devil incarnate in the eyes of many Rangers fans.
Thompson has a pleasing knack of having plenty to say for himself and his club, usually in the name of defending Dundee United, or sometimes in seeking to query the wider instincts of Scottish football.
When the old Rangers were facing liquidation in 2012, and then a possible new journey from the bottom of the football heap, Thompson had plenty to say on the subject. Then came the Rangers boycott of Tannadice last year, when he again roused the United fans to action.
In recent days, Thompson has made provocative comments about not feeling safe at Ibrox, and of how he intends to sit among the United faithful at next month's cup clash.
Thompson may lack some of the softly-softly approach of his father, Eddie, but he stoutly stands by his club. He has also, it must be said, in the face of ferocious cuts, made quite a success of Dundee United in his five years in charge.
He is not everyone's cup of tea, because he exhibits a certain cynicism towards the Glasgow giants, and can be inflammatory and even rabble-rousing. But the fact is, if you are a Dundee United fan, you won't mind Stephen Thompson in the slightest.
When all these arguments are spouted back and forth, there is still a mouth-watering football match to savour. This Rangers-Dundee United cup tie can rightly claim to be the game of the season in Scotland.
United are riding high in the Premiership, currently fourth. Rangers are steadily climbing through the tiers, with what is in effect a Premiership-style team and squad under Ally McCoist.
United, arguably, have the more skilful players, but Rangers retain degrees of their old character, and will have the decided advantage of playing at home. To most it seems a close call, and a dramatic game in prospect.
With a live TV audience watching across Britain, and an Ibrox bulging with the vivid colours of both teams, the irony is that this cup semi-final, for all its wretched birth pangs, has the potential to be quite an advert for Scottish football.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article