Opposition MSPs have called for a culture change at Holyrood in order to counteract government "control" of committees.
The Scottish Parliament's Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee is looking at how to improve the ability of committees to hold the Scottish Government to account by scrutinising legislation and policy.
One of the issues under consideration is whether the status of committee conveners should be enhanced through increased pay or allowances, or by making the position an elected one.
John Lamont MSP, Scottish Conservative business manager, said: "I think it would be very difficult to sell to the outside world any case or any argument for paying politicians more.
"The issue perhaps should be more a change in culture. If you compare some of the committee conveners at Westminster and elsewhere, there is much more of a willingness, I would suggest, maybe to issue statements and issue reports which are critical of government policy.
"I think there's a feeling in certain elements within the Scottish Parliament just now there is a reluctance to do that."
James Kelly MSP, business manager for Scottish Labour, said he was "not convinced" about the need to pay conveners more.
Mr Kelly said: "I agree with John Lamont about the need to change the culture.
"I think as this session has continued there has been evidence that the government has sought to seek greater control, particularly over reports that are coming out of committees, and I think that's been a regrettable development."
He added: "The committee structure has got to reflect the democratic outcome of the election.
"However, I would make the point that if committees are going to operate properly and if they're going to serve a purpose, then they need to properly hold the government to account.
"If we get into a situation where the government, as has been the case in some instances, simply use their majority to push report changes through a committee, then that undermines democracy and it also undermines the role of committees.
"From that point of view, if we're really serious about moving forward and making the Parliament more effective and making committees more effective we should look at the idea of giving a stronger voice to opposition within committees as a counterbalance to the control that the government seeks to exercise."
Joe FitzPatrick, Scottish Government minister for parliamentary business, said committees were doing a "really good job" of scrutinising legislation.
He said: "Most of the time, particularly when committees are looking at legislation, they do take their hats off in terms of party politics and look at the legislation properly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel