Richard Ings, the man who set up the anti-corruption unit within tennis, believes that match-fixing is a greater risk to the sport than doping.
His comments come on the back of an investigation by the BBC and Buzzfeed News which alleges that 16 tennis players are suspected to be involved in match-fixing, with some having been reported to tennis authorities over suspicions that they deliberately lost matches.
The players, who have not been named, include “grand slam champions” and some are playing in this week’s Australian Open. The investigation also alleges that tennis authorities failed to act on warnings that match-fixing was taking place.
Ings was the ATP’s vice-president of rules and competition between 2000 and 2005 before going on to become the CEO of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and he believes that the threat of match-fixing within tennis is huge, which is why he was not surprised by the recent revelations.
“This is nothing new – when I was involved, we were seeing matches with suspicious betting patterns on a regular basis,” he told Herald Sport. “There’s a high risk of matches being fixed in tennis and it’s very easy for a player to fix a match without anyone else knowing. With so many matches taking place at so many levels of competition, and with literally billions of dollars being gambled on tennis each year, there’s money to be made by betting on the outcome of a match.”
It is likely that doping is also present within tennis but for Ings, match-fixing poses a far greater danger. “My own personal view having worked in both anti-doping and anti-corruption is that match-fixing is a greater risk to the integrity of tennis globally than performance-enhancing drugs are,” he says. “The reason I say that is because match-fixing can pervert entire matches and tournaments. It’s easy to do but difficult to detect and there’s rampant opportunity to do it in some far-flung corner of the globe. If you were going to invent a sport that was perfect for match fixing, it would be tennis.”
The Tennis Integrity Unit (TIU), which was set up in 2008 to police the sport, has been heavily criticised in the wake of the investigation following claims that the “core group” of 16 players who were implicated in suspicious activity were flagged up to the TIU yet no action was taken and the players were allowed to continue competing.
For Ings, the establishment of the TIU was a positive step however its opacity is troublesome.
“At the moment, we know that there’s a tennis integrity unit, we know that there’s money being put into the programme- $14 in the past several years- and we know that there’s players who have been suspended and banned for breaches of the programme,” he says.
“But the TIU is incredibly secretive. We don’t know much about what it does, where it’s working or how many matches it looks into each year. We accept that in investigating corruption, some things can’t be shared- you can’t just make frivolous allegations against individual players and importantly, these are often criminal matters too. So we accept that there are limits to what they can say but they can say much more than they are at the moment to give assurance to both the public and the players that the programme really is comprehensive.”
Part of the problem, Ings believes, is that in the wake of the recent sporting scandals, the public’s trust in international governing bodies has been eroded almost to nothing. So tennis must convince observers that they can believe in what they are watching and greater transparency is the only way to achieve this.
“The public has lost its trust in sport; we trusted FIFA and we trusted the IAAF and we’ve been let down so when any international sporting federation says: “we’ve got zero tolerance”- we’ve heard it all before,” he says.
“Transparency and clear explanation about the commitment and the capability to tackle these issues is now what the public needs. I don’t view these allegations as being damaging for tennis, I view this as being an opportunity.”
There is no easy answer to eradicate match-fixing within tennis but for Ings, there are a few key objectives which, if achieved, can reduce the risk.
“Tennis needs to have clear relationships with the legitimate gambling industries so that they receive intelligence of when matches with suspicious betting patterns are taking place,” he explains.
“Also, having the ability to demand telephone records and bank statements from players where you have a credible suspicion and having close working relationships with law enforcement agencies because, in most parts of the world, these activities are criminal offences.
And finally, tennis needs on-site capability in managing these issues so that where there’s a suspicious match about to go on court, it isn’t investigated weeks or months down the track, it’s investigated right there and then.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here