THIS never happens to Scotland. It genuinely felt weird watching a game unfold exactly the way we all wanted it to.
Not only did we win our first game of this World Cup campaign, but we enjoyed good fortune in terms of a lucky goal and even the referee even seemed to be with us. Someone even scored a hat-trick. The ball bounced every way it could for Gordon Strachan and his men, three points were gathered up and it was a lovely thing to see.
Never has the phrase ‘that will do’ been more apt because that result did do and then some. We would have taken a one goal win, especially at half-time when it was 1-1.
Read more: Did Robert Snodgrass mean the first goal of his odd Scotland hat-trick? Ach, who cares
A 5-1 victory in this era of the Scottish national team, even against Malta who have finished bottom of their group seven out of the last eight campaigns, is to be welcomed like a lottery win.
It wasn’t pretty but, hey, it was alright – which is something Bruce Springsteen might say – and while those who literally follow Scotland around the world aren’t quite yet buying Russian phrase books, it was a solid, enjoyable and winning start.
Hooray and all that.
Read more: Malta 1 Scotland 5: Encouraging signs as campaign gets off to a flyer
The match was decided when Malta defender Jonathan Caruana was sent off for a trip on Chris Martin a couple of yards from goal. It never looked like either a red card or a penalty and yet that is what was given. The excellent Robert Snodgrass, more about him later, scored his second to make it 3-1. The win was sealed there and then.
And breathe.
There were times Scotland played well and while the opposition was poor, there were plenty of cause for some much-needed optimism after so many barren years.
Oh, Scotland. You little Malta-teasers. What with you giving us all hope and ideas above our station.
Before the game, those who believe Strachan had lost his desire for the job may have thought his team sheet read more like a resignation letter.
Chris Martin, not the guy from Coldplay, got a start against Malta instead of Steven Fletcher. Eyebrows were raised and questions asked.
Shaun Maloney, the best Scotland player of the last four years and more, was left at home, as were Ross McCormack and Jordan Rhodes whose exclusion was more understandable given his fall from grace at Middlesbrough.
However, Martin scored once and won, cough, a penalty, and then his replacement Fletcher got the fourth goal. If that was the plan then fair play to thee manager.
Oliver Burke played well before tiring, as did Barry Bannon, while Matt Ritchie and a few others comfortably got pass marks. Bannon in particular, who played deep in midfield, fulfilled his remit with aplomb. The Sheffield Wednesday man had a really good night
As did his team.
You know that way we never get one of those fluke goals which everyone else seems to get? Well, it happened early on when Snodgrass’s cross looped into the net to put the Scots in the lead after some decent outbursts of football.
And yet Malta were level within minutes when the usual defensive deficiencies hurt the team in the way a Peter Lorimer volley would do to the more delicate part of the anatomy.
But the understandable panic was premature. Ritchie's perfect cross set-up Martin for his goal, soon after that came the odd penalty incident and from then on it was a case of how many Scotland would score.
It wasn’t quite King Kenny scoring against Wales at Anfield; however, it was a start, and a good one at that for Strachan and his team who were missing some players you would imagine will be key over this campaign.
And talking about missing players, it gladdened the heart to see Snodgrass, a great player and good guy, score three times and looked every inch an international footballer after the best part of two years out with a knee injury so serious he wondered whether he would ever play again.
The final whistle went and everyone, from manager to players, those fans in Malta and the rest watching on television, were left with big smiles on our faces. More of this please.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here